Introduction to Priority Interrupt

Priority interrupt systems are designed to handle multiple interrupt requests from various I/O devices based on their priority levels. The main goal is to ensure that the most critical tasks are addressed first, enhancing the efficiency and responsiveness of the system.

⚑

Efficiency

Optimizes system resource usage

πŸ”’

Priority Levels

Manages multiple interrupt requests

πŸ”„

Responsiveness

Ensures critical tasks are addressed first

Definition and Purpose

Definition: A priority interrupt system assigns priority levels to different interrupt sources and ensures that higher-priority interrupts are serviced before lower-priority ones.

Purpose: The primary purpose is to manage multiple interrupt requests efficiently, ensuring that critical tasks receive immediate attention while less critical tasks are deferred.

🎯

Task Prioritization

Ensures critical tasks are handled first

πŸ“Š

Resource Management

Optimizes system resources

⚑

System Responsiveness

Improves overall system performance

Priority Levels

Hierarchy: Interrupt sources are organized into a hierarchy of priority levels. Each device or interrupt source is assigned a specific priority level.

Preemptive Handling: If a high-priority interrupt occurs while a lower-priority interrupt is being serviced, the current process is suspended, and the high-priority interrupt is handled first.

πŸ”’

Hierarchical Structure

Organized levels of importance

⏸️

Preemption

Higher priority interrupts can pause lower ones

🏷️

Assigned Levels

Each device has a specific priority

Mechanisms for Priority Interrupts

πŸ”—Daisy-Chaining

A simple hardware approach where devices are connected in series. The first device in the chain has the highest priority, and the priority decreases down the chain.

⚑Parallel Priority Interrupt

A more complex and faster approach where each device is connected to a priority encoder. The encoder determines the highest-priority interrupt and sends a signal to the CPU.

πŸ”„Software Polling

The CPU polls the interrupt sources in a predefined priority order. This method is simpler but slower compared to hardware-based mechanisms.

πŸ”—

Daisy-Chaining

Simple series connection of devices

⚑

Parallel Priority

Fast encoder-based system

πŸ”„

Software Polling

CPU checks devices in order

Interrupt Vectors and Service Routines

Interrupt Vector Table (IVT): A table that holds the addresses of the interrupt service routines (ISRs) for various interrupts. Each interrupt source has a specific entry in the IVT.

Interrupt Service Routine (ISR): A special block of code executed in response to an interrupt. The ISR for a high-priority interrupt must complete quickly to minimize the delay for lower-priority interrupts.

πŸ“‹

IVT

Table of ISR addresses

πŸ’»

ISR

Code for handling interrupts

⚑

Quick Execution

High-priority ISRs must be fast

Applications

⏱️

Real-Time Systems

Priority interrupt systems are crucial in real-time systems where timely processing of critical tasks is essential, such as in embedded systems, industrial control systems, and medical devices.

πŸ–₯️

Multitasking Operating Systems

Used in operating systems to manage hardware interrupts from various peripheral devices like keyboards, mice, and network cards.

πŸ“‘

Communication Systems

Ensures that urgent communication tasks, like handling incoming data packets, are given priority over less critical tasks.

Challenges and Considerations

🧩

Complexity

Implementing a priority interrupt system can add complexity to both hardware and software design.

βš–οΈ

Overhead

Context switching and handling multiple interrupts can introduce overhead, impacting system performance if not managed efficiently.

πŸ•’

Starvation

Lower-priority tasks may face starvation if high-priority interrupts occur frequently. Proper system design and scheduling are necessary to mitigate this issue.

Types of Priority Interrupt Systems

πŸ”—Daisy-Chaining Priority System

Mechanism: Devices are connected in a series (daisy-chain) with each device having an interrupt enable line that passes through it to the next device in the chain.

Priority Determination: The device closest to the CPU has the highest priority. If it generates an interrupt, it will block further interrupts from lower-priority devices.

Advantages: Simple and cost-effective.

Disadvantages: Not scalable for systems with many devices; lower-priority devices may experience long wait times if higher-priority devices frequently generate interrupts.

⚑Parallel Priority Interrupt System

Mechanism: Each interrupting device has a separate interrupt line connected to a priority encoder, which determines the highest-priority interrupt.

Priority Determination: The priority encoder identifies the highest-priority interrupt and sends the corresponding interrupt vector to the CPU.

Advantages: Fast and efficient; better suited for systems with multiple interrupt sources.

Disadvantages: More complex and expensive due to additional hardware (priority encoder).

πŸ”„Software Polling

Mechanism: The CPU periodically checks each device's status in a predefined order to determine if it has requested an interrupt.

Priority Determination: The order in which devices are polled defines their priority.

Advantages: Simple to implement in software; no need for additional hardware.

Disadvantages: Slower than hardware-based systems; not suitable for systems requiring immediate interrupt servicing.

πŸ”’Interrupt Priority Level System

Mechanism: Each interrupt request line is assigned a priority level. The CPU includes a priority controller that handles multiple interrupt requests based on these levels.

Priority Determination: The priority controller ensures that the highest-priority interrupt is serviced first.

Advantages: Highly flexible and can handle complex priority schemes; allows dynamic priority assignment.

Disadvantages: Requires sophisticated hardware and software support.

🧭Vectored Interrupt System

Mechanism: Each interrupt source is assigned a unique vector address, which directly points to the interrupt service routine (ISR).

Priority Determination: The priority is determined by the vector addresses assigned to the interrupt sources.

Advantages: Fast and efficient interrupt handling; reduces the need for interrupt processing overhead.

Disadvantages: Complex to implement; requires hardware support for vector addresses.

πŸ”€Nested Interrupts

Mechanism: Allows an interrupt service routine (ISR) to be interrupted by higher-priority interrupts.

Priority Determination: Higher-priority interrupts can interrupt lower-priority ISRs.

Advantages: Improves system responsiveness for high-priority tasks; prevents critical task delays.

Disadvantages: Increases system complexity; requires careful management to prevent stack overflow and ensure ISR completion.